One Minute Inside WHIT
The film shows the whole loop — student work in, teaching insight out. The full walkthrough follows, chapter by chapter.
Free for educators·No credit card·FERPA-first
Built by Casey Cuny — 2024 California Teacher of the Year
Contents
A walkthrough in seven chapters, annotated by the teachers who piloted it.
Monday: The Work Comes In
Create an assignment in minutes — essays, exit tickets, and formative quizzes, in every subject. Students submit before the bell. WHIT starts reading immediately.
Every kind of student work, one front door
- Essays, exit tickets, debates, FRQs, and quizzes One place for all of it, in any subject — not just English.
- Write with WHIT, or upload a file In-app drafting with up to three teacher-enabled AI feedback rounds, or traditional document submission.
- Standards and rubrics built in SBAC and College Board–aligned rubrics, standards pickers, or your own criteria.
The exit-ticket loop — create it, collect responses, see the analysis.
You can tell this was made by a teacher.
Hannah Cutting — Valencia High School
See Why They Missed It — Not Just That They Did
While the stack is still warm, WHIT reads every submission and hands you the class’s thinking: misconceptions by standard, blind spots, and suggested groupings.
Film in production: the class-analysis walkthrough.
Misconceptions · standards mastery · groupings
One class set in — misconceptions, mastery, and groupings out.
The analysis a data team would take a week to build
- Misconceptions, by standard Not just who missed a question — the specific misunderstanding behind the miss, tied to the standard it blocks.
- Smart groupings, defined for you Students grouped by demonstrated need from their actual work — ready for stations, conferencing, or reteach.
- Chat with WHIT about the whole class set “How were transitions? Who used the new technique? What should I teach tomorrow?” — ask anything, grounded in every paper.
From the pilot
The feedback on student performance is way clearer. It takes out the leg work for determining next steps and lets us just pick what area to reteach.
Hannah Cutting · English Teacher, Valencia High School
Groupings and class trends, built from the work itself.
From the pilot
Quick, actionable feedback — with the groups defined for me and teaching strategies that I can implement quickly.
Sarah Ford · Pilot Teacher, Spring 2026
of pilot teachers said WHIT better explains why students miss questions than the tools their district already pays for
found WHIT’s results more useful than their current tools
Spring 2026 pilot · 3,000 students
Tuesday: The Teaching
Monday’s exit tickets become Tuesday’s lesson plans — built from your students’ actual thinking, not a generic template.
Lesson plans that already know your students
Grounded in UDL, brain-based learning, and growth-mindset principles — and aimed squarely at the misconceptions your class showed yesterday. Complete with objectives, activities, and materials. Save your favorites and build on what works.
- Responsive, not generic Every plan is generated from your class’s data — the reteach targets are already chosen.
- Quick wins for tomorrow Fifteen-minute activities that surgically target a single misconception — when you don’t need a full lesson.
From the pilot
I like the lesson plans it provided for the areas that needed improvement — it identified the problem and gave me solutions.
Jeff Albert · Pilot Teacher, Spring 2026
Tuesday’s plan, drafted from Monday’s data.
Socratic questions from your students’ own arguments
WHIT reads a full class set of debate performances on your essential question and drafts Socratic seminar questions tailored to how your students actually reasoned — ready to export straight into a lesson.
Seminar questions, drawn from the debates themselves.
AI for the teacher. Feedback from the teacher.
WHIT’s AI analyzes, drafts, and organizes — for you. Nothing reaches a student until you say so: the grade is yours, the voice comments are yours, and every insight passes through your judgment. Built to make teachers more present in the feedback cycle — not absent from it.
The grading view: your expertise, amplified
WHIT drafts feedback and organizes the evidence; you make the call. Grade an entire class set in the time five papers used to take.
- Voice comments, in your voice Record personal audio feedback where a rubric score isn’t enough.
- Rubric-aligned scoring Consistent, standards-tied criteria — SBAC, College Board, or your own.
- Grading goals that respect your brain Research-based pacing keeps momentum without burnout — sustainable, not heroic.
From the pilot
It’s going to save a ton of time when it comes to grading — especially something like an exit ticket.
Doug Butler · Valencia High School
Rubrics, drafted comments, voice notes — you decide what ships.
Students Who Choose to Revise
What students see: coaching that reads like a teacher wrote it, up to three draft cycles before submission, and skills that visibly grow — while the grade and voice comments still come from you.
Personal coaching at every draft
Real-time revision guidance with no copy-paste shortcuts — personalization unlike any writing tool before it. Students write about what matters to them, get specific coaching on their own sentences, and see themselves becoming writers.
- Up to three draft cycles Teacher-enabled revision rounds before final submission — feedback while it can still change the work.
- Skills mastered, visibly From thesis development to embedded quotes — students watch their skill map fill in over the year.
Drafting with WHIT — coaching, not answers.
Critical thinking, sharpened by debate
In Debatotron, students build arguments, meet counterarguments, and practice rhetorical moves — metaphor, analogy, concession — with an AI partner that pushes back. Quiet students find their voice; confident ones find their limits.
The debate dashboard — argument by argument.
of students chose to revise after AI feedback — with no grade incentive
gained by struggling writers on a 10-point rubric — 4.4× the average gain
of revisers went back two or more times — most used all three draft cycles
Valencia HS writing study, 2026 · 73 students · 339 observations · p = 0.01
Six Tools. One Gate: You.
Every tool feeds the same loop — student thinking in, teaching insight out, nothing reaching a student without you.
Elaboration Tutor
Guide students to deepen their thinking through Socratic dialogue and personalized writing coaching.
Practice FRQ
Master AP-level writing with instant feedback, College Board–aligned rubrics, and rigorous scoring.
Debatotron
Sharpen argumentation skills with AI-powered debate practice that ignites critical thinking.
Exit Ticket
Quick formative assessment with AI-analyzed student responses. Check understanding in seconds.
Whit Formative
AI-powered quiz analysis with misconception detection to pinpoint exactly where students need support.
WHIT Leaves
Create a full set of AI-generated formative assessments for an entire unit in minutes.
One Click. Every Classroom.
The same benchmark in every section — misconception analytics that roll up by standard, school, and classroom, and a Tier 2 pipeline that runs without new PD contracts.
- One click launches a district-wide CFA An immutable benchmark — identical for every class, so results are finally comparable across schools.
- WHIT reads every response automatically Misconceptions per standard, per school, per class — not just scores, but why students missed.
- Teachers get next-day reteach plans; leaders get the roll-up No exports, no spreadsheets, no waiting on the data team. It’s just there.
From the pilot
There is always the word ‘data’ being thrown around, but I feel like nothing ever happens with it. With Whit’s tools and targeted feedback, we are able to re-evaluate instruction and tailor it to misconceptions based on different classes — not focus on the same thing for everyone.
William Rivera · West Ranch High School
From the pilot
I can appreciate the insights per each standard — including misconceptions and possible activities to reteach.
Michael Smith · History Teacher, West Ranch High School
of pilot teachers found WHIT more useful than the tools their district already pays for
students in the Spring 2026 pilot across multiple schools and subjects
of teachers self-onboarded successfully with zero live training
Pilot data and study methodology available for district review on request.
In the age of AI, the powerful play goes on — and you may contribute a verse.
The next chapter is your classroom.
Free for educators·No credit card·FERPA-first